1. Aguirre, S. L., Bramsløw, L., Lunner, T., & Whitmer, W. M. Spatial cue distortions within a virtualized sound field caused by an additional listener. Proceedings of the 23rd International Congress on Acoustics, September 2019, Aachen, Germany.
  2. Alfandari, D., Richter, M., Wendt., D., Fiedler, L., & Naylor, G. (in prep.). Task-induced fatigue and motivation influence listening effort as measured by the pupil dilation in a speech-in-noise task.
  3. Fiedler, L., Ala, T. S., Graversen, C., Alickovic, E., Lunner, T., & Wendt, D. (2021). Hearing Aid Noise Reduction Lowers the Sustained Listening Effort During Continuous Speech in Noise—A Combined Pupillometry and EEG Study. Ear and Hearing, 42(6), 1590-1601.
  4. Kramer SE, Bhuiyan T, Bramsløw L, Fiedler L, Graversen C, Hadley LV, Innes-Brown H, Naylor G, Richter M, Saunders GH,  Versfeld NJ, Wendt D, Whitmer WM,  Zekveld AA (2020). Innovative Hearing Aid Research on Ecological Conditions and Outcome Measures: The HEAR-ECO Project. Hearing Review, https://www.hearingreview.com/inside-hearing/research/hear-eco-project-research-on-ecological-conditions-and-outcome-measures
  5. Książek, P., Zekveld, A. A., Wendt, D., Fiedler, L., Lunner, T., & Kramer, S. E. (2021). Effect of Speech-to-Noise Ratio and Luminance on a Range of Current and Potential Pupil Response Measures to Assess Listening Effort. Trends in Hearing, 25, 23312165211009351.
  6. Książek, P., Zekveld, A.A., Fiedler, L., Kramer, S.E., Wendt, D. (2021). Components of pupil dilation responses reveal the interplay between signal-to-noise ratio and recall during and auditory working memory task. In preparation.
  7. Pielage, H., Zekveld, A. A., Saunders, G. H., Versfeld, N. J., Lunner, T., & Kramer, S. E. (2021). The Presence of Another Individual Influences Listening Effort, But Not Performance. Ear and Hearing, Nov-Dec 01;42(6):1577-1589. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001046.
  8. Pielage, H., Plain, B.J., Saunders, G.H., Versfeld, N.J., Lunner, T., Kramer, S.E., and Zekveld, A.A. (2021). Effects of copresence on speech perception in persons with a hearing impairment. Manuscript submitted to Ear & Hearing.
  9. Plain, B., Richter, M., Zekveld, A. A., Lunner, T., Bhuiyan, T., & Kramer, S. E. (2021). Investigating the Influences of Task Demand and Reward on Cardiac Pre-Ejection Period Reactivity During a Speech-in-Noise Task. Ear and Hearing, 42(3), 718.
  10. Plain, B., Pielage, H., Richter, M., Bhuiyan, T. A., Lunner, T., Kramer, S. E., & Zekveld, A. A. (2021). Social observation increases the cardiovascular response of hearing-impaired listeners during a speech reception task. Hearing Research, 410, 108334.
  11. Seifi Ala, T., Graversen, C., Wendt, D., Alickovic, E., Whitmer, W. M., & Lunner, T. (2020). An exploratory Study of EEG Alpha Oscillation and Pupil Dilation in Hearing-Aid Users During Effortful listening to Continuous Speech. Plos One, 15(7), e0235782.
  12. Seifi Ala, T., Graversen, C., Whitmer, W. M., Hadley, L. V., Lunner, T. (in prep). Motivation modifies effort when the task demands it: EEG evidence of an interaction between reward and demand in a speech-in-noise task.
  13. Seifi Ala, T., Alickovic, E., Cabrera, A. F., Rank, M. L., Lunner, T., Hadley, L. V., Whitmer, W. M., Graversen, C. (in prep). Alpha oscillations during effortful continuous speech: From scalp EEG to Ear-EEG. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.

Facebook
Twitter